|
Altamont Enterprise, Letter to the Editor, December 31, 2009:
To the Editor:
I have been attending local town board meetings, planning board meetings, wind study committee meetings, comprehensive land use review committee meetings, and zoning board meetings for the past fifteen months in the in the towns of Berne, Knox, Westerlo, Rensselaerville, Wright and New Scotland. This week I read with great interest a letter to the editor from Patrick Doyle’s wife, Anne-Marie Gorman, the COO of NorthWind and Power. I have had several conversations with Mr. Doyle, founder of NorthWind and Power, at more than one town meeting, but I fail to recall ever meeting his wife at any of those town meetings.
We do need to examine our use of vital natural resources in regards to the production of electricity. However, we need to be careful how our federal government spends our grandchildren’s tax dollars. The so-called investment of billions of our children’s and grandchildren’s dollars on electrical generating systems that operate less than 20% of the time is not a responsible choice. I fail to see the validity of Ms. Gorman’s comparison of the efficiency of a car to wind turbines. Would anyone invest in a car that only worked 20% of the time?
Once again, we hear that we need wind turbines to reduce our dependency on foreign oil when, in fact, the use of oil for generating electricity accounts for only 2% of the total amount of electrical production. The use of oil and natural gas will actually have to increase to operate additional fast-spin electrical facilities to help stabilize the grid because of the introduction of less dependable forms of production such as wind turbines that Ms. Gorman proposes.
Ms. Gorman stated my comments on property values are inaccurate and without substantiation, and then proceeds to site a 164 page study funded by the Wind & Hydropower Technologies Program of the U.S. Department of Energy. Can we truly trust that the Department of Energy has our best interests at heart and that they had absolutely no agenda in seeing that this study came out the way it did? I will leave that for someone else to analyze. However, I will point out that Ms. Gorman stated no loss of property value in homes that were 3000 feet or more away from a wind turbine. Using her own interpretation of the study leaves me unsure how my assertion was incorrect. The Draft Wind Facility Ordinance for New Scotland has a setback of only 1500 feet from homes, and Ms. Gorman actually seems to be proposing setbacks of 3000 feet.
Ms. Gorman also stated that my comments on where Mr. Doyle lived were completely inaccurate. Really? Does Mr. Doyle live in Tug Hill? Does the town of Guilderland have a wind facility planned for Mr. Doyle’s neighborhood? Is Mr. Doyle planning to move to the Sauquoit Valley in Litchfield, New York?
I agree with Ms. Gorman that we need to keep the discussion on wind development focused on the facts and keep personal attacks out of the discussion. I am not sure in what way I have personally attacked anyone. I am only trying to protect my community, my children, future grandchildren, and an area where our family has lived since the 1800’s. Unlike Ms. Gorman and her husband Mr. Doyle, I do not make my living in the wind industry. I donate my time, my money, focus a tremendous amount of my personal attention to this issue, and receive nothing in return except comments and criticism from people like Ms. Gorman, whom I have never even met. I have only commented on things that I, and many others, have heard Mr. Doyle state at local public meetings. Mr. Doyle is promoting his business and his industry; how then are my comments misconstrued as a personal attack?
One of the subjects not mentioned in Ms. Gorman’s letter was that of public safety concerning the installation of these turbines in residential neighborhoods and on small farms. Catastrophic failures in Idaho, Minnesota, California, Pennsylvania and Vermont are raising concerns about public safety. In the past 9 months, two such failures have occurred here in New York State. In March, an industrial wind turbine caught on fire and collapsed in Altona, NY. Early Sunday morning, December 27, another of these units broke off at the base and all 187 tons came crashing to the ground, this time in Fenner, NY. Fortunately, no injuries occurred at either of these failures, but as the pictures show, the failure in Fenner could have been far more serious as it was located in the middle of a farmer’s cornfield.
Repeatedly it is stated how safe and reliable these units are, and installations of these units near children’s playgrounds are becoming more common. Failures with those units have occurred as well.
I agree with Ms. Gorman that energy and the environment are critical issues that are facing our nation and how we deal with them now will directly affect our children’s and grandchildren’s future. I also agree that we need to have a fair and balanced discussion based on the facts. However, we need to be careful not to obfuscate the discussion with misleading statements that have little to do with the siting of industrial wind turbines in residential communities.
While we may never agree on whether or not industrial wind is a viable answer to our energy problems, the real question we need to confront here and now, needs to be - do they belong in residential areas or on our small farms?
If you are looking for reliable unbiased information on wind development, property values and the general health and well-being of people that live around these wind turbines, visit our web site www.helderbergcommunitywatch.org. We receive no monetary profit from our work, and receive no government funds or grants; we rely solely on the generosity of our supporters. Our reward will be sensible legislation that allows us to control our own environment and protect the community in which we and our neighbors live.
Ronald J Jordan
Volunteer
Helderberg Community Watch LLC
Altamont Enterprise, Letter to the Editor, December 3, 2009:
(note – this was sent to the Enterprise for their October 9 edition, but was not printed until December)
To the Editor,
Industrial Wind Turbines all along the Escarpment?
There is something to be said for appreciating the history and heritage that surrounds us in our own backyards. Often the sights and destinations that visitors travel miles to see, we rarely notice; the history that others write and read about often goes ignored by those closest to it, until it is suddenly taken away. Then the people show up and show their outrage, but in this case, as in many others, it will be too late.
When wind developers came to the hilltowns last fall as our battle began, I envisioned our hilltowns covered with these 450-foot monsters scaring the landscape, producing little to no power, just another government handout to big business under the guise of helping out the little guy. Never did I think that this development would possibly extend to the precious Helderberg Escarpment. Of all of the areas I thought that might be developed, I thought this one would be off limits. Its beauty, especially at this time of year, should never be sacrificed in order for a handful of landowners to make a few dollars. The loss of one of the most precious landmarks we have in Albany County should not be allowed to happen. When I have family or friends visiting from other towns, the one thing I take them to see is the magnificence of the escarpment from below, and vast scenic view from the top at the Thacher Park overlook.
I attended the New Scotland Town Board special meeting on September 30 where less than 20 people showed up to hear attorney Todd Mathes explain his proposed wind ordinance for the town, an area that includes the Helderberg Escarpment.
Once again, Mr. Mathes has scripted an ordinance that benefits the wind industry and fails to protect the health, welfare, quality of life and property values of the residents, or for that matter the liability of the town. While he has been removed from the list of advisors for Helderberg Community Energy, his comments regarding the average ambient rural sound level being 45dB(A), and his statement that the problems in Cohocton have been taken care of, speak volumes as to his true allegiance.
Look at Cohocton Wind Watch. Cohocton was the first town in New York to use eminent domain to take over a landowner’s property in order to complete the installation of a wind facility; a facility that the landowner did not want, vote for, or consent to. In the name of landowner’s rights, “I can do what I want with my own property,” he lost his!
I listened to Patrick Doyle, the developer of the Tug Hill Plateau Maple Ridge Wind Farm, an area that has been destroyed by nearly 200 of these industrial giants, say “I would love to see wind turbines up there,” referring to the Helderberg Escarpment. Our family has lived in this area before people were allowed to own property because of the serf system set up by the VanRensselaers. We will not stand by and allow people that develop these facilities, yet live nowhere near them, take away our rights. No, Mr. Doyle, this facility will not be in your backyard as you stated. You live miles away. However, it will be in other people’s backyards. You will not be the one laying in bed unable to sleep. Other people will. You will not be the one having to go to the town and have your taxes lowered because the value of your property has been reduced to a fraction of what it was before. You will not be the one that cannot sell your home. Other people will have that problem. No, Mr. Doyle, just like in Tug Hill, you live nowhere near the areas you would like to see developed.
To the members of the board in the Town of New Scotland, I say - take your time. Look at the areas of this state that have been destroyed by the effects of the industrial wind industry. Travel to Tug Hill by yourselves, stop your car and try to talk to the people that live there. Unfortunately, the ones that have the turbines on their property aren’t allowed to speak to you because their contracts forbid discussing the effects the turbines have had on them. Talk to their neighbors – people that are actually allowed to speak to you – the ones who cannot sleep, the ones who cannot sell their house. Quite a dilemma: can’t stand to live in their own homes that they’ve lived in for years, yet they can’t sell and move away, either, because no one else will buy it. Ban the turbines from the escarpment and protect the most scenic area in Albany County. If there is a place for wind development, it is miles and miles away from people, not in a densely populated area like New Scotland. This legislation should not be rushed through quickly. The consequences are too great, the ramifications life changing.
Do what other responsible towns have done – take your time, like Richmondville, Berne, Knox and Rensselaerville. All those towns are looking at wind. Some have ruled that it has no place in their towns, others are actually finding out what their residents want. Some have started the process of investigation and drafting of a protective wind ordinance, which can take one to two years to create.
To the people living in the town of New Scotland – go to our website Helderberg Community Watch, look at the proposed law, look at the other links, and see the effects of industrial wind when placed in the wrong setting. Get a copy of our free DVD. Hear the stories from the people that actually live with these, not from people giving a sales pitch. Attend your town meetings, send in your comments, and tell them there is no place for industrial wind facilities in a community so densely populated. You only have until October 30th.
Press Release: Altamont Enterprise, August 2, 2009
“Harness the power of our common sense before it is too late.”
What a strange title to use in this situation regarding a wind turbine next to the school in the town of Berne. I’m not sure who penned last week’s editorial, as it was published unsigned, but I have attended all of the recent BKW meetings that involved this subject and I have to wonder if the author of this article attended any.
Common sense would be not placing a wind turbine so close to a school as to pose a danger to our children whom we cherish so much. If you think there is no risk, look up Perkins High School in Ohio. Their three turbines went live in February. One of them self-destructed three days later, sending broken blades flying. Amy Pokorny stated at a recent BKW board meeting that it was a risk we need to take. I disagree. I don’t take unnecessary risks with my own children and I certainly wouldn’t force people to take risks with theirs.
Common sense would be not placing a wind turbine alongside a mountain, in a valley behind the elementary playground. All of the wind facilities I have visited place their turbines on hills to catch as much wind as possible.
Common sense would be not placing a wind turbine alongside a mountain, in a valley behind the elementary playground. All of the wind facilities I have visited place their turbines on hills to catch as much wind as possible.
Common sense would be placing solar panels all along the roof of BKW, and on that point, we agree. I hope the BKW School Board, working with Honeywell, will be able to do so.
Common sense is what the BKW Board used in making their decision. It was not a simple decision to make, and one the Board did not rush into. Members from Helderberg Community Energy (HCE), a small vocal group with the agenda of placing industrial-sized wind turbines in our towns, were all given an opportunity to voice their opinions. Fortunately, the BKW School Board placed the health and safety of our children above the ill-conceived placement of a wind turbine, and chose to spend our tax dollars in a more logical and responsible manner.
You mention the research of HCE and the data they have collected. Preliminary data has actually shown this area to be in the lower end of “fair” for wind. Despite the feeling that the wind is always blowing here in the hilltowns, it is still marginal at best for energy production. Johnson Controls’ claim of 30% efficiency for the turbine was exaggerated and without documentation of any sort. No place in New York State has numbers that high – the facility at Tug Hill is in the range of less than 20%, and Fenner is even lower. Common sense would be that the hilltowns is the wrong place.
You state that Helderberg Community Energy is a not-for-profit agency. It is not; it's an LLC. Not-for-profit a legal status granted by the IRS. The term should not be used in any other manner. This may have been a misunderstanding by the writer of the article, but is an important distinction that should be noted.
The tactics and issues created by wind developers has been the focus of NYS Attorney General Andrew Cuomo for quite some time, and were once again in the headlines last week. I would think that people would be curious as to why an industry that passes itself off as so environmentally friendly and community oriented would attract so much of the Attorney General’s attention.
Russ Pokorny stated that “a lot of people are pretty panicky, and I think it’s based on misinformation.” I disagree. The people who were misinformed were the officials of Cohocton, NY who rushed to site a wind farm in their town, and used eminent domain to take over people’s property. The situation in Cohocton is now so bad that Democratic Congressman Eric Massa, 29th Congressional District, says he is overwhelmed by complaints from constituents, both landowners who originally welcomed turbines on their properties and adjoining landowners, who can no longer live in their homes. Misinformed were the officials of Mars Hill, ME who decided public hearings on turbine placement would be a waste of time, forcing residents to stand by and watch the top of their mountain blown off by the wind developers. Apparently awaiting the results of Rensselaerville’s Wind Study Committee, updating Berne’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and educating the public with scientific truths is considered panicking.
Common sense would dictate that a town would not hire the attorney that was involved with the drafting of the wind ordinance in Cohocton that has produced so many of the problems that Congressman Massa now has to deal with. Unfortunately, the Town of New Scotland has done just that. They have appointed Todd Mathes, a pro-wind attorney that was listed on Helderberg Community Energy’s website as an advisor. Can he have the town’s best interest at heart while drafting an ordinance that will directly affect the organization with which he was so recently associated?
If you’ve lived in this area for any length of time, you have come to appreciate the beautiful Helderberg escarpment. If you live in the Town of New Scotland or anywhere in the hilltowns, you need to be aware that plans are underway to place rows of wind turbines all along the ridgeline of the hilltowns just across the town line in New Scotland. This so-called “Wolf Hill Project” will line the pockets of the large wind companies who make, sell and install the units, and perhaps as few as 4 to 5 landowners, some of which are members of H.C.E. In the end, it will destroy something that generations have enjoyed – the peaceful and quiet beauty of our hilltowns.
Common sense? I don’t think so.
Ronald Jordan
Helderberg Community Watch LLC
Press Releases: Altamont Enterprise, March 5, 2009
The March winds have just started to blow and the big wind industry is
blowing even harder trying to push its way into the Hilltowns.
Rensselaerville has a wind committee in full swing, working at the
furious pace of meeting every week until the process is complete. The
Berne town board is about to vote on a one-year moratorium on wind power
construction in the town. They are also reviewing their comprehensive
plan, and that committee will be soliciting feedback from the members of
the town, and will use that feedback to decide if or where wind
turbines, both industrial and residential, should be allowed in the
town. New York State Law and legal president require these steps to be
taken and require all zoning to be in agreement with each town’s
comprehensive plan. Knox’s present comprehensive plan, like Berne’s
present plan, focus on the preservation of the rural quality and
character of the town, and do not address any wind facilities. However,
Knox’s planning board has been discussing the possibility of passing a
wind ordinance for the past several months.
Most people would believe that in order to protect their town and its
people from these big wind companies we must hurry up and pass a wind
ordinance. This has been repeated over and over at recent town and
planning board meetings. In actuality, the comprehensive plans and
zoning ordinances that currently exist in the towns of Rensselaerville,
Berne and Knox do not permit the construction of industrial wind
turbines. The first step in allowing these 300-450 foot turbines into
our towns is to pass a wind ordinance.
Understandably, the proposed construction of cell towers in East Berne
and Knox has generated some legitimate concerns, but their intrusiveness
is miniscule in comparison to a 450 foot tall industrial wind turbine
whose blades are the size of a modern 747 passenger plane revolving
around on the top of its tower. Industrial wind turbines are capable of
producing excessive noise, both audible and inaudible, damaging the view
shed, destroying and fracturing wildlife habitat cleared for the
turbines and the additional high tension lines required for connection
to the electrical grid.
Dan Driscoll stated his concerns very well in his letter to the editor
last week, and people had better start doing their homework like this
gentleman has. There are consequences in allowing industrial wind
facilities in our towns and once these decisions are made, the changes
will be drastic and permanent. I for one do not want to tell my
grandchildren how beautiful and quiet this town used to be before they
were born, and I for one will not have to make an excuse as to why I
stood by and did nothing to stop them.
Helderberg Community Watch has recently updated its web-site with a
short three minute video produced from clips from the full length
version available on the website. People are busy today, but you do have
three minutes to spare to see for yourself. Go to
helderbergcommunitywatch.org, and look at this video. It is done by
people in three different states, all telling about their personal
experiences with industrial wind. Then check out the other information
that is available on this site and its related links. Don’t think for a
minute what happens in your neighboring town does not affect you. When
an industrial wind facility is allowed in one town, it often spreads
from town to town like a disease. Look at the pictures of the Maple
Ridge Wind Facility in Tug Hill. It did not affect just one town; it
spread, and developers are planning on adding more turbines.
Hilltown residents need to start getting involved and they need to do it
soon. Attend your town board meetings and planning board meetings, and
bring your neighbors with you. Residents of Berne also need to attend
the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Committee meetings. You can and will
make a difference. You don’t need to say much, just give your name and
tell them why you are there and what you want or don’t want done to your
town. Town officials give much of their free time serving on our town
boards and its various committees, and they perform an often thankless
job. Too many nights when you may be home in front of your TV, they are
out late at night for yet another meeting. We are at a critical time.
They need your input, and they need it now.
Next week, on Tuesday the 10^th the Wind Study Committee meets in
Rensselaerville at 7:00pm, and the Knox Town Board meets at 7:30pm. On
Wednesday the 11^th there is a public hearing in Berne for the Wind
Moratorium at 7:00pm with a regular Town Board meeting to follow. On
Thursday the 12^th the Rensselaerville Town Board meets at 7:00pm, and
the Knox Planning Board meets at 7:30pm. Please attend the meetings in
your town. Do it soon, before it is too late.
Ronald J. Jordan
Resident, Town of Berne
Volunteer
Helderberg Community Watch
Press Releases: Altamont Enterprise, February 5, 2009
I have lived in the Town of Berne for the past 27 years and am deeply concerned with the issues that face our hilltowns and with the prospect of large scale wind development and its consequences.
My interest in wind energy started when I was considering installing a small wind turbine on my own property and I have been studying the issues of wind power ever since. I gathered my information on wind energy from many different sources such as books by Paul Gipe, a world renowned expert on wind energy, and from magazines on solar and wind development. I have spent countless hours of research on the internet and have found a wealth of information in the Danish, UK and German sites where they have been living with wind development for years now. It is easy to just go to a NYSERDA site or other equally biased sites pro or con, but the best information still comes from overseas.
Last fall I made the three hour trip to see the Maple Ridge facility at Tug Hill, NY. I saw the destruction of wooded areas, and the marring of scenic vistas that can never be repaired. I saw many areas posted, gated and locked – off limits except to the people that service the turbines. I spoke to people with these units on their own property, and to those people that are forced to live next to the turbines and who receive none of their monetary benefits. I spoke to people that feel they can no longer sell their homes and who have neighbors that will no longer speak to them because of the wind turbines. I encourage you to make this trip yourself. It is a day well spent.
I have seen video after video of people that have had to live with these wind plants in their back yards, and their stories are all the same. They live hundreds of miles apart in different states, the wind facilities were installed and are owned by different companies, but their stories, their complaints, and their advice is all the same: stay informed, get educated, get organized, get involved and under no circumstances let this happen in your town.
My personal education is as a Pharmacist, and between five years of college and 26 years of practice I have learned to be skeptical of all sources of information. I take a drug company’s claims of low incidences of side effects and adverse reactions with the knowledge that that information is coming from the company trying to sell a product. If I want the unvarnished truth, I ask my patients, the people that are actually taking the medication, and not the manufacturer that is selling it. When patient after patient returns with complaints about a certain drug, I take notice and usually, after a period of time, their complaints will be slowly added to the literature.
Some would rather listen to an industrial or community wind developer selling a bill of goods on how great it would be to have an industrial wind facility in our backyard. I will listen to the people that already have them in their backyards, to those that have been forced to live with the consequences, and I will take their advice. I have never had a patient come in and lie to me about a side effect yet, but I have had my share of drug reps shovel their company propaganda on me, and I can certainly tell the difference.
Helderberg Community Watch is an organization that is made up of local citizens that are concerned with protecting their town, their community and their environment. In no way does this group or its members profit from their activities. Large scale wind developers like Shell, Rhizome or Horizon are all concerned with making millions of dollars in profit. Individual landowners that are trying to site turbines on their own property are being misled, and with the prospect of some potential money for themselves, they want the rest of the community to acquiesce to their desires.
I do not think that a handful of landowners in a town as large as Berne have the right to stifle the debate on what should be done to our town. No one has the right to devalue their neighbor’s property, disrupt their sleep, destroy the community’s viewscape or harm its wildlife. No one has the right to destroy our life long expectations of peace and quiet or the gentle tranquility of our hilltowns.
I encourage everyone to do their research, whether at the library or on the internet, and to take the time and go visit a wind facility for yourself. Attend your town meetings. The planning, discussion and drafting of if and how this is going to be allowed is going on right now. I encourage everyone to visit HelderbergCommunityWatch.org and helderbergcommunityenergy.com. When you are on HCW’s site look at all of the links, including the ones that show the debate from both sides and the links to solar sites and other alternatives. You decide who is being biased and who is just telling you like it is – the company propaganda or the testimonials from real people who have nothing to gain from distorting the truth. When you are on HCW’s site, request a free DVD and listen to the stories of the people living with wind turbines in their backyards, before it’s too late for us.
Let’s stop the name calling and stick with the facts. HCW is concerned with our town, its people, the view we see each time we step out of our door, and how we leave the hilltowns to future generations.
We don’t need to put calico hoods on our heads and grab our torches and tin horns … yet. But we can get organized, stand together, and stop the threats to our property. It worked over 150 years ago and it will work again.
Ronald J. Jordan
Press Releases: Altamont Enterprise, January 15, 2009
Why have International Wind Turbine Developers been at Town of Berne Board meetings and the first Comprehensive Plan Review Board meeting pushing their agenda of building industrial wind facilities in our town? They call them "windmills" and "wind farms." These are not the charming windmills of the Dutch countryside, and a group of them is certainly not a farm. These are industrial power generating facilities that require many acres of land to be clear-cut for their installation. They create noise and shadow flicker. Reports of sleep interference and medical problems for the people living near them are increasing all over the country. The developers will push for these turbines to be sited as close as 500ft from your house, as did the Shell Wind Energy contracts that were presented to landowners in October 2008. Alarmingly, the Safety Regulations manual for the 3.0MW Vestas wind turbine instructs technicians and operators, "Do not stay within a radius of 400m (1300 ft) from the turbine unless it is necessary” and “Make sure children do not stay by or play by the turbine." If a turbine catches on fire, workers are instructed to "evacuate and rope off turbine in a radius of minimum 400m (1300ft)." Yet, continually, wind developers are pushing for setbacks far smaller than that 1300ft.
If you think that your input isn’t necessary, think again. The Town of Berne Conservation Board and Planning Board proposed a wind ordinance for the Town of Berne in November 2008 that offered very little protection for residents and was virtually no better than what Shell had proposed. Shell is gone, but Rhizome is reportedly making offers to landowners now. We must fight to protect ourselves from this shortsightedness.
These wind developers have some of our townspeople convinced they can make big money by siting wind turbines on their property. They are good salesmen, and the promise of big money to landowners struggling to pay their taxes is understandably appealing. They promise money for the school system, money for the town, and money for some landowners. They promise that everyone’s taxes can be lowered. Those who propose a "community-based" wind facility are promising the same. What they both fail to mention is that much of their funding comes from federal and state grants, including NYSERDA grants, and that money comes from … guess where … your tax dollars! The money they promise landowners is determined by how much money the facility makes, and the developers are the ones who decide how that is figured. Can we really believe that large corporations are doing this for our benefit? Would we believe this from any other industry?
This is not a matter of "not in my back yard." We completely support reliable, renewable clean energy. It only makes sense that everyone should be willing to do their part, make sacrifices, and support responsible industries that really make a difference. Yes, we need green energy, and we need to reduce our carbon footprint. Everyone points to Denmark as an example of how wind power is the way to go, yet with 20% of all of its electrical capabilities in wind, it yields only 6% of its power from wind, and boasts one of the highest electrical rates in Europe. People have spoken at the Berne Town Board meetings that they are willing to sacrifice some of their property value if it improves our climate. Unfortunately, wind energy has not been shown to decrease CO2 emissions in any country in the world. And were you aware that, on average, wind turbines produce electricity only about 25% of the time? The months of the year that they produce the most are not in the summer, when our electricity demand is the highest. Would you consider a coal burning generator or nuclear facility near your home "worth the sacrifice" if it only worked one quarter of the time? Would you buy a car after learning that it will only run one out of every four times you get in it, and, most likely, not when you need it the most? We wouldn’t accept this kind of performance from any other industry. Why should we accept it from wind power? Hopefully, someday, technology will create more efficient wind turbines, but no one will bother to try if people allow the ones available now to continue to be sited all over the country.
The January 1 issue of the Enterprise ran an article in which Ben Fisher of Rhizome talked about large scale batteries that can instantly inject power into the grid, perhaps solving one of wind power’s disadvantages. He stated that Berne "would be the second place in the world" to host such a facility. Check out Altair Nanotechnologies’ website. Each tractor-trailer sized battery can only hold enough power to supply the grid for 15 minutes. Better choose that quarter-hour wisely folks.
It is clear that we must all become informed on the issue of wind power. Do your homework. Get on the internet, and be careful where you get your facts from. When someone states facts, verify them; when they give generalities, question them. Attend town board meetings and comprehensive plan review meetings. You will be allowed to speak. We must all step up and do so.
Wind developers specifically target communities with farmers and other landowners who are finding it difficult to make ends meet and pay their taxes. There was a time in this town, as demonstrated during the Anti-Rent movement, that neighbor stood with neighbor, risking everything they had so the less fortunate didn’t get taken advantage of. Those better off stood against the tyranny of the rich and powerful hand in hand with those who could not pay their rents. There was a time when, against the odds, our ancestors fought and won struggle that helped shape the future of this great nation. It is a heritage we can be proud of. I’d like to think that time has not passed.
Dawn Goodfellow Jordan
Website Information
If you have any content, such as pictures or links that you would like to see up on this website, please send them in an email to: webmasterhcw@gmail.com
|